<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple FCPX: Not what you think it is</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lynda.com/2011/07/07/apple-fcpx-not-what-you-think-it-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2011/07/07/apple-fcpx-not-what-you-think-it-is/</link>
	<description>the blog of lynda.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:28:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Conti</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2011/07/07/apple-fcpx-not-what-you-think-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-206011</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Conti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 16:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=7557#comment-206011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a long time apple user and have been using FCP since version one.  I am an educator, a freelancer and a former broadcast veteran.  

It is possible that people are formulating opinions too quickly, without fully testing the waters.  Can you blame them?  We spend extreme amounts of time and money buying and learning programs - only for them to be discontinued, after what is in my opinion - a relatively short time following updates.  

I am not even entirely sure what programs still exist from the traditional studio bundle.  I truly don&#039;t know what I&#039;m going to do at this point.  Should I go back to Avid?  Should I dive into Premiere?  I am careful to research the things that I read on these forums and I always want people or companies to have the chance to defend themselves.  

Those calling this hysteria are being just as ignorant as the folks you are accusing.  For ten years I looked forward to new updates to the amazing program that FCP had always been.  I so far don&#039;t like what I am seeing or hearing.  I don&#039;t have the time right now to completely re-learn a program that I already knew and mastered to find out that it is not for me.  If it is indeed true that you cannot open up an old project on the new version than I would have to strongly consider that a deal breaker.  

Even if I do switch to a new platform I will always check back with my old love.  I am hopeful that Apple will remain the awesome company they have always been and realize that the people complaining just might have a legitimate gripe.  How about hosting an internet forum to answer questions and concerns.  Who knows? They might clear up a lot of bad rumors.  One thing is clear - They have some explaining to do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a long time apple user and have been using FCP since version one.  I am an educator, a freelancer and a former broadcast veteran.  </p>
<p>It is possible that people are formulating opinions too quickly, without fully testing the waters.  Can you blame them?  We spend extreme amounts of time and money buying and learning programs &#8211; only for them to be discontinued, after what is in my opinion &#8211; a relatively short time following updates.  </p>
<p>I am not even entirely sure what programs still exist from the traditional studio bundle.  I truly don&#8217;t know what I&#8217;m going to do at this point.  Should I go back to Avid?  Should I dive into Premiere?  I am careful to research the things that I read on these forums and I always want people or companies to have the chance to defend themselves.  </p>
<p>Those calling this hysteria are being just as ignorant as the folks you are accusing.  For ten years I looked forward to new updates to the amazing program that FCP had always been.  I so far don&#8217;t like what I am seeing or hearing.  I don&#8217;t have the time right now to completely re-learn a program that I already knew and mastered to find out that it is not for me.  If it is indeed true that you cannot open up an old project on the new version than I would have to strongly consider that a deal breaker.  </p>
<p>Even if I do switch to a new platform I will always check back with my old love.  I am hopeful that Apple will remain the awesome company they have always been and realize that the people complaining just might have a legitimate gripe.  How about hosting an internet forum to answer questions and concerns.  Who knows? They might clear up a lot of bad rumors.  One thing is clear &#8211; They have some explaining to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Chow, social media/blog manager</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2011/07/07/apple-fcpx-not-what-you-think-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-202911</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Chow, social media/blog manager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=7557#comment-202911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those waiting for our Final Cut Pro X course, it&#039;s out now. Final Cut Pro X Essential Training: http://www.lynda.com/tutorial/83098]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those waiting for our Final Cut Pro X course, it&#8217;s out now. Final Cut Pro X Essential Training: <a href="http://www.lynda.com/tutorial/83098" rel="nofollow">http://www.lynda.com/tutorial/83098</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2011/07/07/apple-fcpx-not-what-you-think-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-200176</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=7557#comment-200176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What other courses does lynda.com have lined up for FCP X? Any advanced material?

-Tim]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What other courses does lynda.com have lined up for FCP X? Any advanced material?</p>
<p>-Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tre</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2011/07/07/apple-fcpx-not-what-you-think-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-188413</link>
		<dc:creator>Tre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=7557#comment-188413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, whose going to use DVD&#039;s in 5 years?  Getting rid of building DVD menus makes my job as a wedding videographer a lot easier.  I love X!  It&#039;s going to just get better and better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, whose going to use DVD&#8217;s in 5 years?  Getting rid of building DVD menus makes my job as a wedding videographer a lot easier.  I love X!  It&#8217;s going to just get better and better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Ainscough</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2011/07/07/apple-fcpx-not-what-you-think-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-188395</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Ainscough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=7557#comment-188395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wouldn&#039;t expect lynda.com to be objective about FCPX considering they would most likely want to support more people &quot;learning&quot; FCPX.  So take this article into context of where you are reading it.

It&#039;s more than just a &quot;few&quot; professionals that do NOT want to use FCPX and feel they&#039;ve been left out in the cold by Apple (which for the most part they have).  Apple have also made NO SECRET that FCPX is never going to be a &quot;Professional&quot; tool, not now, not with upgrades (free or paided).

Like others, I bought FCPX, tried it, got disappointed, uninstalled it, and got a refund from Apple.  I don&#039;t mind changes ... I like changes, BUT change for a reason, not just to be different.  The changes in FCPX have NOT made my workflow easier or better or more efficient ... just different, and &quot;different&quot; doesn&#039;t help me get work do more quickly.

And finally, it&#039;s MISSING a huge amount of functionality beyond just &quot;multi-cam&quot; and XML.  I could list them all, but there just isn&#039;t enough comment room.

And then there is Motion 5 and Compressor 4 ... two additional tools for FCPX that have not changed at all???  Support for 3D objects in Motion 5 is virtually non-existant, just a it was in Motion 4.  Compressor 4 interface is virtually identical to prior version and is no faster.  And where is Blu-ray authoring (you know, menus, titles, etc. like DVD Studio supported)??

I&#039;m sorry, but 3+ years in the making and FCPX is the best Apple can do given the current wealth and resources Apple now has?

The road is clear for me, I&#039;m migrating over to Adobe who are currently offering 50% discount to FCP owners.  But fortunately lynda.com has Adobe training also ... As a long time premium subscriber to lynda.com, I&#039;d rather see more training videos and excercise files around Adobe&#039;s suite of tools for professional and non-professionals.

Rob]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t expect lynda.com to be objective about FCPX considering they would most likely want to support more people &#8220;learning&#8221; FCPX.  So take this article into context of where you are reading it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s more than just a &#8220;few&#8221; professionals that do NOT want to use FCPX and feel they&#8217;ve been left out in the cold by Apple (which for the most part they have).  Apple have also made NO SECRET that FCPX is never going to be a &#8220;Professional&#8221; tool, not now, not with upgrades (free or paided).</p>
<p>Like others, I bought FCPX, tried it, got disappointed, uninstalled it, and got a refund from Apple.  I don&#8217;t mind changes &#8230; I like changes, BUT change for a reason, not just to be different.  The changes in FCPX have NOT made my workflow easier or better or more efficient &#8230; just different, and &#8220;different&#8221; doesn&#8217;t help me get work do more quickly.</p>
<p>And finally, it&#8217;s MISSING a huge amount of functionality beyond just &#8220;multi-cam&#8221; and XML.  I could list them all, but there just isn&#8217;t enough comment room.</p>
<p>And then there is Motion 5 and Compressor 4 &#8230; two additional tools for FCPX that have not changed at all???  Support for 3D objects in Motion 5 is virtually non-existant, just a it was in Motion 4.  Compressor 4 interface is virtually identical to prior version and is no faster.  And where is Blu-ray authoring (you know, menus, titles, etc. like DVD Studio supported)??</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but 3+ years in the making and FCPX is the best Apple can do given the current wealth and resources Apple now has?</p>
<p>The road is clear for me, I&#8217;m migrating over to Adobe who are currently offering 50% discount to FCP owners.  But fortunately lynda.com has Adobe training also &#8230; As a long time premium subscriber to lynda.com, I&#8217;d rather see more training videos and excercise files around Adobe&#8217;s suite of tools for professional and non-professionals.</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2011/07/07/apple-fcpx-not-what-you-think-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-187848</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 03:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=7557#comment-187848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As someone who is in the midst of editing 50 years of family home movies, (about 20 hrs of video), I&#039;ve been working my way through them, sorting clips into bins and sequences.  Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but FCPX has completely trashed all that effort, and there is no way to carry over that work into FCPX]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who is in the midst of editing 50 years of family home movies, (about 20 hrs of video), I&#8217;ve been working my way through them, sorting clips into bins and sequences.  Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but FCPX has completely trashed all that effort, and there is no way to carry over that work into FCPX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Brazzi</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2011/07/07/apple-fcpx-not-what-you-think-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-187529</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Brazzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=7557#comment-187529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CharlieT,

Please watch &lt;em&gt;Migrating from Final Cut Pro 7 to Final Cut Pro X&lt;/em&gt; when it releases in the next few days. Storing projects and media on a secondary scratch disk is something that FCP X does very well. It will even detect this material automatically when you launch the application, and it won&#039;t even hiccup when it isn&#039;t there. That scratch drive will move from machine to machine much easier than I&#039;ve seen with FCP 7. 

I have no idea if FCP X will be right for you or your students (which is my answer to everybody). However, you certainly will be in a better place to decide when you really know what it does.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CharlieT,</p>
<p>Please watch <em>Migrating from Final Cut Pro 7 to Final Cut Pro X</em> when it releases in the next few days. Storing projects and media on a secondary scratch disk is something that FCP X does very well. It will even detect this material automatically when you launch the application, and it won&#8217;t even hiccup when it isn&#8217;t there. That scratch drive will move from machine to machine much easier than I&#8217;ve seen with FCP 7. </p>
<p>I have no idea if FCP X will be right for you or your students (which is my answer to everybody). However, you certainly will be in a better place to decide when you really know what it does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CharlieT</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2011/07/07/apple-fcpx-not-what-you-think-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-187077</link>
		<dc:creator>CharlieT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 16:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=7557#comment-187077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From an educational standpoint for our full-time Creative Media students FCP X in it&#039;s current incarnation can&#039;t be used. We have 50 seats in 3 rooms used by multiple students, until they can store their entire project (event and media) on their scratch drives it won&#039;t work for us.

However for part-time evening classes aimed at home or one-man-band clients the power and speed will be a huge bonus - looking forward to the training series!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From an educational standpoint for our full-time Creative Media students FCP X in it&#8217;s current incarnation can&#8217;t be used. We have 50 seats in 3 rooms used by multiple students, until they can store their entire project (event and media) on their scratch drives it won&#8217;t work for us.</p>
<p>However for part-time evening classes aimed at home or one-man-band clients the power and speed will be a huge bonus &#8211; looking forward to the training series!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogo Estiguer</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2011/07/07/apple-fcpx-not-what-you-think-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-186811</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogo Estiguer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 12:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=7557#comment-186811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanx Nicholas and lynda.com. I’m looking forward to the new training series.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanx Nicholas and lynda.com. I’m looking forward to the new training series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2011/07/07/apple-fcpx-not-what-you-think-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-186779</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 11:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=7557#comment-186779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I enthusiastically purchased FCPX shortly after it was released and was unfortunately quite disappointed. I get all the talk of doing things differently and new approaches etc, but I found the workflow too strange. Also the scope for customization in project preferences was quite limited. I felt that the software was making too many assumptions for me. Output options were also quite limited compared to other packages around for either Mac or pc platforms. After perseveringly for a while I gave into frustration and would you believe it... Apple refunded me in full. But I&#039;m always open to new ideas and will watch the lynda tutorials with interest and may give it a second chance.  But I must also say, Sony Vegas Movie Studio Platinum 11 is extremely capable and very good value by comparison. Its currently my product of choice. Horses for courses... C.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enthusiastically purchased FCPX shortly after it was released and was unfortunately quite disappointed. I get all the talk of doing things differently and new approaches etc, but I found the workflow too strange. Also the scope for customization in project preferences was quite limited. I felt that the software was making too many assumptions for me. Output options were also quite limited compared to other packages around for either Mac or pc platforms. After perseveringly for a while I gave into frustration and would you believe it&#8230; Apple refunded me in full. But I&#8217;m always open to new ideas and will watch the lynda tutorials with interest and may give it a second chance.  But I must also say, Sony Vegas Movie Studio Platinum 11 is extremely capable and very good value by comparison. Its currently my product of choice. Horses for courses&#8230; C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 444/477 objects using memcached

 Served from: blog.lynda.com @ 2013-05-25 06:28:04 by W3 Total Cache -->