<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deke&#8217;s Techniques: Creating a flawless panorama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lynda.com/2011/05/24/dekes-techniques-creating-a-flawless-panorama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2011/05/24/dekes-techniques-creating-a-flawless-panorama/</link>
	<description>the blog of lynda.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:28:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colleen Wheeler</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2011/05/24/dekes-techniques-creating-a-flawless-panorama/comment-page-1/#comment-207913</link>
		<dc:creator>Colleen Wheeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=7216#comment-207913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@esthezia That&#039;s a good question. When I posed it to Deke, he (quite practically) said, &quot;Well, if you&#039;re going to take a picture with your phone, then I&#039;d probably use the phone to process it.&quot; It&#039;s certainly fun to create panoramas on the fly. 

Of course, your limitations would be orientation and resolution. Since you inspired this quest for me, I also hit up my colleague Jim Heid (the Content Manager for our Photography segment) on his thoughts:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&quot;As a panorama addict myself, my own advice would be this: I&#039;m pretty sure many cameras&#039; pano features require you to hold the camera in landscape orientation. But you can get a wider vertical field of view in your panorama by shooting the originals in portrait orientation. So if your scene is &quot;vertically interesting&quot; -- maybe there are interesting rocks in the foreground or tall trees or buildings in the scene -- you might prefer to shoot the source images in vertical orientation and then use Photoshop to stitch them.

Also, some cameras&#039; pano modes limit the number of photos you can use -- for example, three horizontal shots. If your cam is among them and you want to capture a wider scene, then Photoshop is your tool of choice.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The one agreement all around is that the phone-based panorama apps are fun and fairly amazing!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@esthezia That&#8217;s a good question. When I posed it to Deke, he (quite practically) said, &#8220;Well, if you&#8217;re going to take a picture with your phone, then I&#8217;d probably use the phone to process it.&#8221; It&#8217;s certainly fun to create panoramas on the fly. </p>
<p>Of course, your limitations would be orientation and resolution. Since you inspired this quest for me, I also hit up my colleague Jim Heid (the Content Manager for our Photography segment) on his thoughts:</p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8220;As a panorama addict myself, my own advice would be this: I&#8217;m pretty sure many cameras&#8217; pano features require you to hold the camera in landscape orientation. But you can get a wider vertical field of view in your panorama by shooting the originals in portrait orientation. So if your scene is &#8220;vertically interesting&#8221; &#8212; maybe there are interesting rocks in the foreground or tall trees or buildings in the scene &#8212; you might prefer to shoot the source images in vertical orientation and then use Photoshop to stitch them.</p>
<p>Also, some cameras&#8217; pano modes limit the number of photos you can use &#8212; for example, three horizontal shots. If your cam is among them and you want to capture a wider scene, then Photoshop is your tool of choice.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The one agreement all around is that the phone-based panorama apps are fun and fairly amazing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: esthezia</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2011/05/24/dekes-techniques-creating-a-flawless-panorama/comment-page-1/#comment-192400</link>
		<dc:creator>esthezia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=7216#comment-192400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is fantastic, Deke! I&#039;m a big fan of yours!

I just have one question, please: if my camera supports taking panoramic pictures, should I use this feature or the Photomerge feature in Photoshop?
Of course, using photomerge one can take landscape pictures and merge them together, having a taller picture with more detail. But other than that, what&#039;s your opinion on using camera&#039;s panoramic feature (or my phone&#039;s app for taking panoramas) ?

Thanks a lot!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is fantastic, Deke! I&#8217;m a big fan of yours!</p>
<p>I just have one question, please: if my camera supports taking panoramic pictures, should I use this feature or the Photomerge feature in Photoshop?<br />
Of course, using photomerge one can take landscape pictures and merge them together, having a taller picture with more detail. But other than that, what&#8217;s your opinion on using camera&#8217;s panoramic feature (or my phone&#8217;s app for taking panoramas) ?</p>
<p>Thanks a lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leo</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2011/05/24/dekes-techniques-creating-a-flawless-panorama/comment-page-1/#comment-163422</link>
		<dc:creator>leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 20:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=7216#comment-163422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re the man!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re the man!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 339/372 objects using memcached

 Served from: blog.lynda.com @ 2013-05-24 20:52:21 by W3 Total Cache -->