<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll: How often do you want new course content?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lynda.com/2010/12/17/poll-how-often-do-you-want-new-course-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2010/12/17/poll-how-often-do-you-want-new-course-content/</link>
	<description>the blog of lynda.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:28:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rahul</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2010/12/17/poll-how-often-do-you-want-new-course-content/comment-page-1/#comment-1048384</link>
		<dc:creator>rahul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 16:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=5473#comment-1048384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i searched every where about j2ee and struts in java but does nt find anything i really need the projct u did woth php and mysql with one small project but in java i doesnt find anythink like that please realse someting like that]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i searched every where about j2ee and struts in java but does nt find anything i really need the projct u did woth php and mysql with one small project but in java i doesnt find anythink like that please realse someting like that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ogden Orthopedics</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2010/12/17/poll-how-often-do-you-want-new-course-content/comment-page-1/#comment-241013</link>
		<dc:creator>Ogden Orthopedics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 00:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=5473#comment-241013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any word on the Java course?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any word on the Java course?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tinos</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2010/12/17/poll-how-often-do-you-want-new-course-content/comment-page-1/#comment-206439</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=5473#comment-206439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Michael Ninness
Hello There, When do you reckon you will indeed publish the Java course please? 
Its 1st of August.
Thanks in advance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael Ninness<br />
Hello There, When do you reckon you will indeed publish the Java course please?<br />
Its 1st of August.<br />
Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ogden Orthopedics</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2010/12/17/poll-how-often-do-you-want-new-course-content/comment-page-1/#comment-167694</link>
		<dc:creator>Ogden Orthopedics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=5473#comment-167694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great News!  Thanks for the reply!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great News!  Thanks for the reply!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ninness, VP of Content</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2010/12/17/poll-how-often-do-you-want-new-course-content/comment-page-1/#comment-163278</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ninness, VP of Content</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 15:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=5473#comment-163278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@OgdenOrthopedics: Our first Java course, called &lt;em&gt;Up and Running with Java&lt;/em&gt;, is in production and is scheduled to be published in late June to early July. Our &lt;em&gt;Google Adwords Essential Training&lt;/em&gt; course is also in production and is scheduled to be published in mid June.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@OgdenOrthopedics: Our first Java course, called <em>Up and Running with Java</em>, is in production and is scheduled to be published in late June to early July. Our <em>Google Adwords Essential Training</em> course is also in production and is scheduled to be published in mid June.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ogden Orthopedics</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2010/12/17/poll-how-often-do-you-want-new-course-content/comment-page-1/#comment-163276</link>
		<dc:creator>Ogden Orthopedics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 15:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=5473#comment-163276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Michael Ninness

May I ask why there hasn&#039;t been a Java course released yet?  May I ask do you have plans to release both a Java and/or a Google Adwords course?  I like the idea of releasing titles a chapter at at time, but I am so far behind on all the other courses that it is going to be awhile before I get caught up to you!  Thanks for all you guys do!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael Ninness</p>
<p>May I ask why there hasn&#8217;t been a Java course released yet?  May I ask do you have plans to release both a Java and/or a Google Adwords course?  I like the idea of releasing titles a chapter at at time, but I am so far behind on all the other courses that it is going to be awhile before I get caught up to you!  Thanks for all you guys do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ninness</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2010/12/17/poll-how-often-do-you-want-new-course-content/comment-page-1/#comment-111120</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ninness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=5473#comment-111120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Karen Martin: I agree with pretty much everything you commented on. I wanted the blog post to be as short as possible, so admittedly it lacked complete context. What I was really asking was whether or not for certain topics our members would value us publishing training in a series format as we finished each module, or if they would rather the content be published in its entirety when it was complete, as we&#039;ve always done in the past. 

We work 100% for our members here, and so we want to always be exploring how we can evolve our production and publishing process to enable us to provide the training our members need and want in a more agile and quicker fashion. To that end, the poll and the comment discussion was very helpful. It verified that it isn&#039;t an either/or, and helped inform us that for any given body of content, we should consider how we go about &quot;packaging&quot; the content so that it can be delivered to our members as quickly as possible.

For example, we will continue to publish New Features courses, day and date when a new software application or upgrade is released. We will continue to publish our Essential Training series as close to the release date of software as possible.

For the more intermediate to advanced topics, we will be trying out some new ideas this year. For example, we have a new series for intermediate to advanced Illustrator users coming out in the very near future, by our good friend Mordy Golding. Rather than publishing a single 20-hour course, we&#039;ll be releasing a new 2-hour course every 6 to 8 weeks as Mordy completes them.

You may have noticed that we started a new weekly series format in January called Deke&#039;s Techniques, were we publish 1 to 2 new video tutorials every week. These are Photoshop and Illustrator creative projects that can be done in 10 minutes or less.

At the end of the day, we realize that to truly serve the needs of our members, we can&#039;t use a one size fits all approach. Some members prefer to start at the first video of a course and work their way through an 8 to 10 hour course one video at a time in linear fashion until they are done. Some simply look for the one video that answers the one question they have at that moment. And others aren&#039;t looking for the answer to a specific question at all -- they just want to be inspired. And still others do all of the above throughout any given month.

We&#039;re just trying to make sure we live up to our promise that our platform and service truly allows our members to &quot;learn at their own pace&quot;.

Also, we really do appreciate that you take the time to tell others about lynda.com. We do indeed have an Affiliate Program where you can earn revenue when those you refer to us becoming a paying member. You can read more about the program here: http://www.lynda.com/partners/affiliates.aspx

Cheers,

Michael Ninness
VP of Content, lynda.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Karen Martin: I agree with pretty much everything you commented on. I wanted the blog post to be as short as possible, so admittedly it lacked complete context. What I was really asking was whether or not for certain topics our members would value us publishing training in a series format as we finished each module, or if they would rather the content be published in its entirety when it was complete, as we&#8217;ve always done in the past. </p>
<p>We work 100% for our members here, and so we want to always be exploring how we can evolve our production and publishing process to enable us to provide the training our members need and want in a more agile and quicker fashion. To that end, the poll and the comment discussion was very helpful. It verified that it isn&#8217;t an either/or, and helped inform us that for any given body of content, we should consider how we go about &#8220;packaging&#8221; the content so that it can be delivered to our members as quickly as possible.</p>
<p>For example, we will continue to publish New Features courses, day and date when a new software application or upgrade is released. We will continue to publish our Essential Training series as close to the release date of software as possible.</p>
<p>For the more intermediate to advanced topics, we will be trying out some new ideas this year. For example, we have a new series for intermediate to advanced Illustrator users coming out in the very near future, by our good friend Mordy Golding. Rather than publishing a single 20-hour course, we&#8217;ll be releasing a new 2-hour course every 6 to 8 weeks as Mordy completes them.</p>
<p>You may have noticed that we started a new weekly series format in January called Deke&#8217;s Techniques, were we publish 1 to 2 new video tutorials every week. These are Photoshop and Illustrator creative projects that can be done in 10 minutes or less.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, we realize that to truly serve the needs of our members, we can&#8217;t use a one size fits all approach. Some members prefer to start at the first video of a course and work their way through an 8 to 10 hour course one video at a time in linear fashion until they are done. Some simply look for the one video that answers the one question they have at that moment. And others aren&#8217;t looking for the answer to a specific question at all &#8212; they just want to be inspired. And still others do all of the above throughout any given month.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re just trying to make sure we live up to our promise that our platform and service truly allows our members to &#8220;learn at their own pace&#8221;.</p>
<p>Also, we really do appreciate that you take the time to tell others about lynda.com. We do indeed have an Affiliate Program where you can earn revenue when those you refer to us becoming a paying member. You can read more about the program here: <a href="http://www.lynda.com/partners/affiliates.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.lynda.com/partners/affiliates.aspx</a></p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Michael Ninness<br />
VP of Content, lynda.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Martin</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2010/12/17/poll-how-often-do-you-want-new-course-content/comment-page-1/#comment-107971</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=5473#comment-107971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doing a poll is wonderful if the person taking the poll has all the information available to him/her prior to taking a poll. I voted for having new information every month, but after reading some of the comments a lot of things make sense.  It really wound depends on what the course as to whether or not to release the course in segments.  I understand now that it takes a course a long time to develop, but to me, it would seem easier to allow perhaps 3 trainers to develop a course, that way when an outline is broken down, perhaps if it is taken in segments by three different people, information can be gotten out quicker. As one reader said, as you learn different versions of software, for instance, MS Word, I learned 07 and by the time that came out, 2010 was coming out, and I had to go through the whole course of 2010 from the beginning to find out that I knew most of the stuff, but I&#039;m afraid that if I don&#039;t watch the entire course, I will miss something.  So I&#039;m not sure that leaving out parts of the information and just jumping to what is new, because I believe you already have courses where you point out what is new.  If I had to revote again, I might change my vote instead of monthly to break it up into longer hours, if that had to be a choice. I would like to say, that I would like to see intermediate courses in some of the applications within Microsoft Office.  The basics of the program is pretty simple for most folks that know a lot of applications, but give me the &quot;meat of the what the course can really do,&quot;  When I go on a job, anybody can learn the tools, but show me how to put those tools to work to show me some dynamic stuff of what I can do with a powerpoint slide.  I hope you can sense what I mean.  I made a comment before that real life applications are what we need to show us how to use the tools that you have taught us.  I have not found too many intermediate courses except for perhaps an excel program. I hope perhaps if I am not conveying my message in the correct way that someone who may understand parts of what I am saying will chime in to add anything to make it more clear or to perhaps add something I have missed.  I know I&#039;m not the only one that thinks like this.  Also, I have turned a lot of people onto lynda.com that absolutely love the site, I wish there were incentives for people who tell folks about lynda.com.  Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doing a poll is wonderful if the person taking the poll has all the information available to him/her prior to taking a poll. I voted for having new information every month, but after reading some of the comments a lot of things make sense.  It really wound depends on what the course as to whether or not to release the course in segments.  I understand now that it takes a course a long time to develop, but to me, it would seem easier to allow perhaps 3 trainers to develop a course, that way when an outline is broken down, perhaps if it is taken in segments by three different people, information can be gotten out quicker. As one reader said, as you learn different versions of software, for instance, MS Word, I learned 07 and by the time that came out, 2010 was coming out, and I had to go through the whole course of 2010 from the beginning to find out that I knew most of the stuff, but I&#8217;m afraid that if I don&#8217;t watch the entire course, I will miss something.  So I&#8217;m not sure that leaving out parts of the information and just jumping to what is new, because I believe you already have courses where you point out what is new.  If I had to revote again, I might change my vote instead of monthly to break it up into longer hours, if that had to be a choice. I would like to say, that I would like to see intermediate courses in some of the applications within Microsoft Office.  The basics of the program is pretty simple for most folks that know a lot of applications, but give me the &#8220;meat of the what the course can really do,&#8221;  When I go on a job, anybody can learn the tools, but show me how to put those tools to work to show me some dynamic stuff of what I can do with a powerpoint slide.  I hope you can sense what I mean.  I made a comment before that real life applications are what we need to show us how to use the tools that you have taught us.  I have not found too many intermediate courses except for perhaps an excel program. I hope perhaps if I am not conveying my message in the correct way that someone who may understand parts of what I am saying will chime in to add anything to make it more clear or to perhaps add something I have missed.  I know I&#8217;m not the only one that thinks like this.  Also, I have turned a lot of people onto lynda.com that absolutely love the site, I wish there were incentives for people who tell folks about lynda.com.  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imogene Love</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2010/12/17/poll-how-often-do-you-want-new-course-content/comment-page-1/#comment-75410</link>
		<dc:creator>Imogene Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 07:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=5473#comment-75410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the idea of making smaller pieces available before the whole because sometimes I go through whole programs and other times I just need to know how to do one thing. If it&#039;s covered in a small chapter then I&#039;m set.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of making smaller pieces available before the whole because sometimes I go through whole programs and other times I just need to know how to do one thing. If it&#8217;s covered in a small chapter then I&#8217;m set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://blog.lynda.com/2010/12/17/poll-how-often-do-you-want-new-course-content/comment-page-1/#comment-74676</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lynda.com/?p=5473#comment-74676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would depend on the course. A course introducing someone to a software package should probably be done at once (this would help keep the internal course flow smooth - if you break things up they tend to become very independent and information is repeated). Also, this would enable the person to learn it when they needed it, while skipping over the parts not needed (either because they&#039;ve already figured it out or knew it from previous software).

However, if the course is one that&#039;s teaching features about an already known topic, breaking that course up would be feasible and probably preferable.

Of course, I&#039;m speaking from the perspective of someone who is &quot;behind the times&quot; so to speak. None of the stuff I&#039;m learning is (less than a year) time sensitive.

For courses that are time sensitive, perhaps you can do short intros to new software? Like, for example, a short video on Photoshop CS5 new Content Aware feature within a week after CS5&#039;s release.

Also, you could do demo videos of the software. Again, going with the old CS5 example, showing someone using photoshop cs5 and as all the new features happen, point them to where they can (or will be able to) learn how to do them. This would also help people to know what the programs do (so when my coworker talks about ProgramX I&#039;ll have a basic idea of the type of work she is doing).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would depend on the course. A course introducing someone to a software package should probably be done at once (this would help keep the internal course flow smooth &#8211; if you break things up they tend to become very independent and information is repeated). Also, this would enable the person to learn it when they needed it, while skipping over the parts not needed (either because they&#8217;ve already figured it out or knew it from previous software).</p>
<p>However, if the course is one that&#8217;s teaching features about an already known topic, breaking that course up would be feasible and probably preferable.</p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;m speaking from the perspective of someone who is &#8220;behind the times&#8221; so to speak. None of the stuff I&#8217;m learning is (less than a year) time sensitive.</p>
<p>For courses that are time sensitive, perhaps you can do short intros to new software? Like, for example, a short video on Photoshop CS5 new Content Aware feature within a week after CS5&#8242;s release.</p>
<p>Also, you could do demo videos of the software. Again, going with the old CS5 example, showing someone using photoshop cs5 and as all the new features happen, point them to where they can (or will be able to) learn how to do them. This would also help people to know what the programs do (so when my coworker talks about ProgramX I&#8217;ll have a basic idea of the type of work she is doing).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 450/486 objects using memcached

 Served from: blog.lynda.com @ 2013-05-23 05:15:27 by W3 Total Cache -->